Is Machiavellianism still relevant now? Can one still reach the 1% through it?

And like always, Welcome back to Impartial blog. How is the feel? Aight, Uptight! To be back in the world of e-blogging has been quirky curve for me, mostly navigating the changed lanes. Back few years, Internet was a organic place, but with the advent of fast and Go rich pyramid, where digital agencies now control once the beloved internet, a parallel free world. The amount of jargon and distribution focused marketing has been clutter, but apart clutter the curve was pretty flat.

So, lets talk Machiavellianism? The Power people people in history to exist, maybe ever since inception have practiced this, albeit knowingly or not the term. To those who don’t know, either you get this or you don’t, because this game has specification requirements in the quantitative terms like Intelligence quotient, with less than IQ of 120, it is not for you. I am sorry, but nepotism isn’t just about status, it is truly about Genes which i have always held the make or break for any human. Does that mean, one with low IQ can’t make in this World, nope. Anyway 75% of the population has IQ lower than that of 110 and Rat race is repetition, hard work dedication perseverance not about intelligence much.

Fun fact, Greed is associated with IQ ranging lower than 110. The higher the spectrum the less the Greed, obvious explanation, The en masse care about the brand of Car and superficiality with higher intelligence, one is pretty much free of the validation curve and starts seeing Car as a mode of transportation from point A to Point B and that’s pretty much it. The concept of money itself is created by the most intelligent people as a means to control to population. How is this Validation curve related to intelligence? Does one really need IQ test to know about IQ, yes to measure through some standardized set of test true, but in non quantitative terms, a high functioning being gets to know from early days, that he is seemingly smarter than the herd and gradually with ageing the need for external validation dissipates on account of overwhelming validation and that’s Why with IQ ranging upwards 140, the illusionary power control of Money fades and even stats reveal IQ ranging 130-135 is sweet spot for hunter gather mindset to take over.

So, Machiavellianism operates on the core principle that Men have trivial need of protecting Women and Children and Women have the trivial need of Protecting Children, but No one really cares about Men, for Men are disposable in terms of hunter gather mindset, where the existential objective of human is to continue its race so basically one man can impregnate 10000 or more women in a year, but one woman can get pregnant only once and so forth. I guess, one might find this so foolish, where a huge chunk of population is no more trivial and hence the the heading Is Machiavellian still relevant? But, if you understand the entire philosophy, it would be nothing less than awakening, one can see through people as if they were transparent, it is that popular but it is like fight club, No body talks about it, because those who can understand it don’t need it, those who can’t wont get it. Also, i have not explained it to core i have just highlighted the advent of idea and the content is dark triad.

Now, what sparked this was exactly, How the Digital marketing companies are selling this to whosoever with the gem bag as a guide to crack the one %, but the problem is what use is hand gun to the arm less? Further, Even if some one learns it, pays the greatest to teach it as if it was something to be spoon feed, it won’t count as in with the objective of entering the exclusive 1% club, for they created it. It is almost like competing with Usain bolt on a race track. Back few ages it was very relevant but in the age of information, it is wet Phosphorous sulfide. In the past, even just being able to learn this would change lives, when ignorance was inevitable,but still this will give you growth but won’t help you enter the 1% for they already know it, they have always know it.

And this is it. I would again conclude by saying, If one has to learn this, it is not for the one. The 1% thing is made up notion for what it carries, i just used it for reference perceptive. See ya in the next one.

Published by RESHAB CHHETRI

ITS ALL ABOUT THE, NATURE AND THE FREAK, BEAUTY AND THE BEAST.

Leave a comment